Differences Among Learners, Real And Not

Share Button

The idea that students have particular “learning styles”—visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.—is a popular and persistent one despite the lack of scientific evidence to support it. (For a great summary of the research, see this blog post by UVA cognitive scientist Daniel Willingham.)

The apparent weakness of learning styles theory does not mean, however, that students don’t differ from one another. They clearly do. But let’s focus on differences that have empirical support. Scott Barry Kaufman points out one such set of differences in one of his recent columns on the Scientific American website—that is, differences in working memory.

As Scott explains, “Working memory involves the ability to maintain and manipulate information in one’s mind while ignoring irrelevant distractions and intruding thoughts. Working memory skills are essential for everyday intellectual functioning.” And learners vary in the capacity of their working memory, a fact that teachers can take into account:

“In an educational setting, helping students overcome working memory burdens can be particularly helpful. Over the past decade John Sweller and colleagues have designed instructional techniques that relieve working memory burdens on students and increase learning and interest. Drawing on both the expertise and working memory literatures, they match the complexity of learning situations to the learner, attempting to reduce unnecessary working memory loads that may interfere with reasoning and learning, and optimize cognitive processes most relevant to learning.

Cognitive Load Theory can be particularly useful for students with working memory deficits who are otherwise extremely intelligent and competent as it allows them to more easily demonstrate their brilliance.” (Read more here.)

For learners with such working memory deficits (and for all of us when we’re learning something new or difficult), reducing cognitive load can lead to big improvements in performance. We can do so by breaking concepts and problems into smaller steps, weeding out extraneous information, presenting information in multiple modalities (e.g.,  supplementing written text with pictures or aural information), and simply slowing the pace of learning so that we don’t become overwhelmed.

To quote Dan Willingham: “People do learn differently, but I think it is very important to say exactly how they learn differently, and focus our attention on those differences that really matter.” What are some other evidence-based distinctions we can make among learners?

Share Button

3 Responses to “Differences Among Learners, Real And Not”

  1. I wonder how different this is from regular special education techniques. What could regular public school teachers learn from special educators?

  2. Lyn Lesch says:

    I think it would be correct to say, though, that children of different ages rely on different senses to learn. For instance, children 3-5 rely heavily on muscle memory to grasp concepts, while babies of course access their environment largely through their auditory capacity. Also, reducing everything to cognition seems just too limiting.

  3. It seems to me students do have different learning styles–but I worked with mostly ESL(K-12) which probably skewed my perceptions. Let’s face it, good teaching should absolutely include all learning styles. Sadly, most teacher just like to talk and seldom use group work, games, or visual and graphic stimulus. Student achievement goes down but teachers and their teaching styles refuse to be held responsible.

Leave a Reply